Legal Opinion

State v. PANIAGUA-MIGUEL

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 26, 2010No. C081714CR; A140848PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of first-degree robbery, ORS 164.415, two counts of second-degree robbery (Counts 2 and 3), ORS 164.405, and unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220, all based on the same criminal episode. He contends that the trial court erred in failing to merge the two second-degree robbery convictions, which were based on violations of separate paragraphs of the second-degree robbery statute— ORS 164.405(1). That statute provides, in part:

“A person commits the crime of robbery in the second degree if the person violates ORS 164.395 and the person:
“(a) Represents by word or conduct…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. Valladares-JuarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rystedt v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API