Legal Opinion
Holly Barrett v. Manpower US, Inc. and Pfizer Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided April 2, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01283Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN HOLLY BARRETT, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 25-CV-1283-SCD MANPOWER US, INC, and PFIZER INC, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER Manpower, a staffing agency, assigned Holly Barrett to work at Pfizer’s warehouse. Barrett takes oxycodone by prescription, and Pfizer supervisors raised concerns about that. After providing a doctor’s note, and after only two weeks on the assignment, Barrett was discharged. Barrett alleges that Manpower and Pfizer, as joint employers, regarded her as disabled and terminated her in violation of the Americans with…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kendale L. Adams v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Hallinan v. Fraternal Order of Police of Chicago Lodge No. 7Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.