Harkin v. Brundage
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EYAN A. EYANS, Circuit Judge,
This appeal involves a controversy between appellants, who were appointed receivers of the Daniel Boone Woolen Mills, Inc., by the superior court of Cook county, 111., upon a bill filed by. one Harry Hurwitz, a stockholder, and appellee, the receiver appointed by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois upon the suit of the United States Worsted Sales Company, a creditor. Adopting the language of counsel, appellants will be referred to as the state court receivers, appellee as the federal court receiver, and the Daniel Boone Woolen…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Palmer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Moran v. SturgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Pacific Live Stock Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Empire Trust Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boynton v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement Dist.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- First Nat. Bank of Medford, Or. v. Stewart Fruit Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1927
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- Christian v. R. Hoe & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933