Legal Opinion

Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 24, 2017No. 16-999CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Bruggink, Judge.

In its amended complaint, plaintiff, Hanover Insurance Company (“Hanover”), seeks to recover $440,000 from the United States on a theory of equitable subrogation. Hanover executed payment and performance bonds on behalf of its principal, B & J Multi Service Corporation (“B & J”), in connection with a contract between B & J and the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) to repair the steam system at a VA facility in West Haven, Connecticut. Plaintiff contends that it notified the VA of a default by B & J, triggering its right to be equitably subrogat-ed to B & J’s right…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Balboa Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API