Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Bruggink, Judge.
In its amended complaint, plaintiff, Hanover Insurance Company (“Hanover”), seeks to recover $440,000 from the United States on a theory of equitable subrogation. Hanover executed payment and performance bonds on behalf of its principal, B & J Multi Service Corporation (“B & J”), in connection with a contract between B & J and the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) to repair the steam system at a VA facility in West Haven, Connecticut. Plaintiff contends that it notified the VA of a default by B & J, triggering its right to be equitably subrogat-ed to B & J’s right…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Balboa Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020