Bolton v. Van Heusen
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
One of these cases is a suit in equity, the other an action at law. The suit in equity was instituted first. Summarily stated, the allegations of the bill are that the defendant Van Heusen (hereafter called the defendant) employed the plaintiff to invent a certain kind of collar and thereafter agreed orally with the plaintiff that, if he would apply for patents covering the invention and assign the applications for patents to the defendant, the latter would finance the obtaining of the patents and the marketing of the collar and pay the plaintiff thirty per cent of the profits derived from…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Somerby v. BuntinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- City of Worcester v. Lakeside Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Keown v. KeownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Williams v. Pittsfield Lime & Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Novel Iron Works, Inc. v. Wexler Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Joseph B. Doherty, Sr. v. Doherty Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Gulesian v. Newton Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.