Legal Opinion

Dunaway v. Fellous

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1993No. 73293PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bilandic

Plaintiffs filed a direct appeal to this court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 302 (134 Ill. 2d R. 302) from an adverse ruling of the circuit court of Madison County which held that it did not have jurisdiction over the persons of the defendants under the Illinois Dramshop Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 43, par. 135).

The plaintiffs, Robert W. Dunaway, Jr., a minor by and through his mother and next friend Jill Dunaway, Robert Dunaway, Sr., and Jill Dunaway, individually, filed a 10-count complaint on April 29, 1991. Counts I through V named Eighteen Thousand Corporation, d/b/a Orville &…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Wimmer v. KoenigsederIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. West American Insurance Co. v. Westin, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Collins v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, FIREMEN'S ANNUITY & BEN. FUND OF CHICAGOIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Swissland Packing Co. v. CoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Campbell v. MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Banks v. Ribco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Banks v. Ribco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API