Legal Opinion

Heim v. Werth

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 1974No. 47,318PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ter Curiam:

This is an appeal in a damage action wherein Ambrose Heim (plaintiff-appellant) sustained injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of Donald Werth (defendantappellee), while Heim was a passenger in Werth’s automobile. Only simple negligence was alleged in the petition, and the trial court sustained defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff was a “guest” — that the guest statute, K. S. A. 8-122b, applied.

The sole question is whether the record before the trial court was sufficient to declare the plaintiff a guest as a matter of law.

In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Henry Ex Rel. Henry v. BauderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Vaughn v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Bedenbender v. WallsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  4. Ten Eyck v. HarpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Rothwell v. TransmeierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Daniels v. ChaffeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  3. Resolution Trust Corp. v. BoppSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Bolser v. Zoning Board for Aubry TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. In re Estate of LentzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API