Legal Opinion

Ten Eyck v. Harp

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 5, 1966No. 44,553PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing two garnishment proceedings commenced by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff, Harold Ten Eyck, Jr., commenced an action against the defendant, Glen W. Harp, for property damage sustained by him as a result of an automobile collision involving the defendant’s automobile and that of a third party, one Johannes, which was allegedly caused by the negligence of the defendant. Summons was served upon the defendant pursuant to the “long-arm statute” (then G. S. 1949, 8-401, as amended), who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phelps v. SchmuckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Buzbee v. Allen County State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  3. First State Bank v. LowderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Loose v. BrubacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Caplinger v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  5. Daniels v. ChaffeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API