Legal Opinion

Woodward v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 6, 2014No. 70949-6-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — Under the Uniform Conflict of Laws — Limitations Act, chapter 4.18 RCW, the statute of limitations of the state where the claim is substantively based applies. Here, while the driver, the passengers, and the vehicle owner were from Washington, the automobile accident occurred in Idaho. We conclude the injured passenger’s suit is based in Idaho’s interest in its rules of the road and the conduct on those roads. We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the claim as barred by Idaho’s two-year statute of limitations.

Trickey, J.

*4FACTS

¶2 On March 27, 2011, Claire Woodward, Angelina Miller, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Spider Staging Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Martin v. Humbert Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Bush v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Ellis v. BartoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woodward v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Woodward v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Woodward v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Woodward v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API