Legal Opinion

Bush v. O'CONNOR

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 31, 1990No. 10138-0-IIIPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, J. —

John L. O'Connor petitioned for discretionary review of a partial summary judgment holding him liable to Ethel and Walter Bush for legal malpractice. We accepted review. The Bushes alleged Mr. O'Connor negligently failed to file an action against State Farm, their underinsured motorist (UIM) carrier, before the effective date of the tort reform act of 1986, Laws of 1986, ch. 305. We hold Mr. O'Connor correctly determined Washington law did not apply to the Bushes' action. We therefore reverse the partial summary judgment obtained by the Bushes, and direct entry of summary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Johnson v. Spider Staging Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lewis v. American Family Insurace GroupKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. OlsenSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  5. Sayan v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Davita Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Federal Insurance Company v. Scarsella Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Martin v. Humbert Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API