Gratz v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court after argument on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The issue for decision is whether the Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service properly called and ordered delivery of plaintiffs’ loan collateral.
FACTS
The following facts derive from the administrative record and are undisputed, unless otherwise noted. James L. and Therese Gratz (“plaintiffs”) operate farms in Lafayette County, Wisconsin. During the period in question, plaintiffs participated in the Price Support, Farm Storage Grain…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sun Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Gross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Raines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Frank's Livestock & Poultry Farm, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Frank's Livestock & Poultry Farm, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Harris v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993