Neylon v. Ford Motor Company
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
■Case, J.
The question is whether, in this compensation case, there is evidence to support a finding that the workman sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. He was employed by respondent as a utility man or car loader. In the course of his regular duties, at about noon, he was unloading car seat frames, each weighing about 10 or 15 pounds, from a freight car. He was standing on a pile of frames in the car and was pulling the frames off one at a time and handing them down, in like order, to a fellow worker who was on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
3Cited by12 opinions
- Broadwell Realty Services, Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Snoden v. Watchung BoroughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Reliance Ins. v. Armstrong W. Ind.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Neylon v. Ford Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Viuda de Salazar v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.