Legal Opinion

Neylon v. Ford Motor Company

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 11, 1952PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

■Case, J.

The question is whether, in this compensation case, there is evidence to support a finding that the workman sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. He was employed by respondent as a utility man or car loader. In the course of his regular duties, at about noon, he was unloading car seat frames, each weighing about 10 or 15 pounds, from a freight car. He was standing on a pile of frames in the car and was pulling the frames off one at a time and handing them down, in like order, to a fellow worker who was on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Broadwell Realty Services, Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  2. Snoden v. Watchung BoroughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. Reliance Ins. v. Armstrong W. Ind.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  4. Neylon v. Ford Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Viuda de Salazar v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API