Legal Opinion
Simo v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2003No. 01-55937PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed January 16, 2003 [316 F.3d 974], is amended as follows:
Slip op. at 762, line 9 [316 F.3d at 979]: Replace the phrase “the union supporters” with “union officials and supporters”
Slip op. at 782, line 16 [316 F.3d at 990] : In the sentence beginning “We find that the workers have not presented,” replace “evidence amounting to” with “evidence that a reasonable jury could conclude amounts to”
Slip op. at 783, line 11 [316 F.3d at 991]: Strike the paragraph beginning “Similarly, the union argues”
Slip op. at 788, line 1 [316 F.3d at 994]: Strike the clause “that she wouldn’t…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simo v. Union Of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- (PC) Howard v. RodriguezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024