Legal Opinion

Rackley v. Fairview Care Centers, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2001No. 990044PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 We granted certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals holding that defendant did not violate a clear and substantial public policy when it terminated plaintiff's employment. See Rackley v. Fairview Care Ctrs., Inc., 970 P.2d 277, 282 (Utah Ct.App.1998).

BACKGROUND

T2 On November 1, 1998, plaintiff Cathleen L. Rackley began working as an at-will employee for defendant Fairview Care Centers, Inc., as the administrator of a nursing home known as Fairview West. In that capacity, she made suggestions to management and took steps to bring the care…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Regence Bluecross Blueshield Of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Jasper v. H. Nizam, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  3. Penunuri v. Sundance Partners, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. MacArthur v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States Ex Rel. Sikkenga v. Regence Bluecross BlueshieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API