United States Ex Rel. Sikkenga v. Regence Bluecross Blueshield
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Concerned that “two companies [were] bilking the United States out of millions of dollars,” Edyth Sikkenga brought suit under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a), alleging that her former employer, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah (“Regence”), three Regence managers, and Associated Regional and University Pathologists (“ARUP”) presented false Medicare claims to the Government. Sikkenga also presented the claim that Regence submitted a false budget payment request to the Health Care Financing Authority (“HCFA”),1 the agency that manages Medicare, and…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Grubbs v. KannegantiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States Ex Rel. Lemmon v. Envirocare of Utah, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Regence Bluecross Blueshield Of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States ex rel. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- United States of America ex v. Keypoint Government SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.