State v. Flowers
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Defendant appeals her conviction for second degree murder on two grounds. First, defendant argues the trial court erred in its denial of a motion to suppress, based on an alleged wrongful police interrogation. Second, defendant assigns error to the trial court’s decision to limit the scope of testimony by defendant’s expert witness. We find no error, and affirm defendant’s conviction.
*301Evidence presented at the suppression hearing tended to show the following facts. On 21 February 1991, police officers responded to a phone call reporting a shooting at the home of defendant and her…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. CorleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.