Legal Opinion

Willis Randolph v. People of the State of California Attorney General of the State of California James Hamlet, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 19, 2004No. 03-16064PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Willis Randolph appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 1986 state court conviction for murder. We hold that if the State places a cooperating informant in a jail cell with a defendant whose right to counsel has attached, and if the informant then makes a successful effort to stimulate a conversation with the defendant about the crime charged, the State thereby violates the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights under Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246 (1964).…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States v. Luis Manuel Rodriguez-LaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Ayers v. HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. State of Iowa v. Peter Leroy VealSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  4. Rubalcado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  5. Smith v. BerghuisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API