Legal Opinion
Ayers v. Hudson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 5, 2010No. 08-3310PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner David Ayers, an Ohio prisoner, appeals the district court order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On appeal, Ayers argues that his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated when the state trial court allowed a jailhouse informant, Donald Hutchinson, to testify regarding incriminating statements made by Ayers in response to Hutchinson’s questioning. The sole issue on appeal is whether the judgment of the Ohio Court of Appeals on this question was an unreasonable application of clearly established…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Davis v. LaflerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Phillips v. Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- State of Tennessee v. Howard Hawk WillisTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Warren English v. Mary BerghuisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Davis v. LaflerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.