Legal Opinion

In re Duluth, S. S. & A. Ry. Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 31, 1945No. 13310PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

This matter came before the undersigned, one of the Judges of the above named Court, on the amended petition of the intervener, Louis Lober, for the hearing and determination, as a separate issue, of his claim that the claims of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company be subordinated to the claims of the owners of the first mortgage five per cent bonds of the debtor.

The matter is presented on the facts set forth in the amended petition of the intervener, which are admitted in the amended answer of the Canadian Pacific, and the facts alleged in the amended answer of said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. McCulloch v. Canadian Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lehman v. StoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. In re Duluth, S. S. & A. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API