Legal Opinion

State v. Price

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 26, 1996No. 94-736-AppealPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEDERBERG, Justice.

The issue before us is whether criminal contempt can be punished by incarceration for a period longer than one year. The State of Rhode Island (state) has appealed to the Supreme Court the finding by a Family Court justice that G.L.1956 § 11 — 1—1—the statute that sets forth the punishment for common-law offenses not covered by statute — applies to criminal contempt and consequently establishes a maximum penalty for that offense. For the reasons related below, we sustain the state’s appeal and reverse the judgment of the Family Court. A summary of the pertinent facts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Eilenbecker v. District Court of Plymouth CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bouchard v. PriceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  2. Town of Coventry v. Baird Properties, LLC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  3. Gardiner v. GardinerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  4. Kevorkian v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. Price v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API