State v. Price
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEDERBERG, Justice.
The issue before us is whether criminal contempt can be punished by incarceration for a period longer than one year. The State of Rhode Island (state) has appealed to the Supreme Court the finding by a Family Court justice that G.L.1956 § 11 — 1—1—the statute that sets forth the punishment for common-law offenses not covered by statute — applies to criminal contempt and consequently establishes a maximum penalty for that offense. For the reasons related below, we sustain the state’s appeal and reverse the judgment of the Family Court. A summary of the pertinent facts…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Eilenbecker v. District Court of Plymouth CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bouchard v. PriceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- Town of Coventry v. Baird Properties, LLC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Gardiner v. GardinerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Kevorkian v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Price v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.