Legal Opinion

Moore v. Krenek

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 13, 1926No. 7015PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaugh, J.

The trial court sustained defendant’s general demurrer to plaintiff’s first amended original petition. Plaintiff declined to further amend his pleadings, and judgment was rendered that he take nothing. From this judgment he has appealed.

The court having sustained the general demurrer, we have given no consideration to the defendant’s special exceptions nor to the defenses pleaded. As against a general demurrer the allegations of plaintiff’s petition must be given every reasonable intendment in support of the right sought to be enforced, and if, when so taken, they state a cause of action, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. Latta & HapperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Taylor v. GilleanTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Bruyere v. Liberty Nat. Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Murphy v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Carter Bros. & Co. v. BushTexas Supreme Court · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. Superior Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. First State Bank of Terrell v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Moore v. KrenekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Hughes v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Moore v. KrenekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API