City of Eastlake v. Ohio Board of Building Standards
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentLocher, J.
At the threshold of our concern herein is the ultimate question of whether there is a “conflict” between the statute and ordinance. More narrowly framed for our consideration herein, the issue is whether a statute regulating over a certain matter automatically preempts and overrides a municipality from regulating on the same subject matter.
The answer is unequivocably “no.”
An ordinance is not ipso facto invalid if it regulates the same subject matter as does a statute, if there is not a “head-on collision” between the legislative enactments. An ordinance which imposes more restrictive…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GuentherSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Heidle v. BaldwinOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Arey v. SherrillOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- STATE, BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of TroutdaleOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State ex rel. Klapp v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.