Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Eastlake v. Ohio Board of Building Standards

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1981No. 80-1094Published

1DissentLocher, J.

At the threshold of our concern herein is the ultimate question of whether there is a “conflict” between the statute and ordinance. More narrowly framed for our consideration herein, the issue is whether a statute regulating over a certain matter automatically preempts and overrides a municipality from regulating on the same subject matter.

The answer is unequivocably “no.”

An ordinance is not ipso facto invalid if it regulates the same subject matter as does a statute, if there is not a “head-on collision” between the legislative enactments. An ordinance which imposes more restrictive…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GuentherSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Heidle v. BaldwinOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State Ex Rel. Arey v. SherrillOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. STATE, BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of TroutdaleOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State ex rel. Klapp v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API