Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Klapp v. Dayton Power & Light Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1967No. 40544PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

The determinative question for decision is whether the city of Piqua has the right to terminate the use of its streets, alleys, etc., by The Dayton Power & Light Company in furnishing electric energy to persons, firms and corporations located within the corporate limits of the municipality without submitting the matter to the Public Utilities Commission in compliance with the provisions of Sections 502-2 and 504-3, General Code, commonly known as the Miller Act. Those sections, without substantial change, are now Sections 4905.20 and 4905.21, respectively, Bevised Code.

Section 4905.20 reads:

“N…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Arey v. SherrillOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Toledo Edison Co. v. City of ClydeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Garcia v. Siffrin Residential Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API