Legal Opinion
The Daniel Kern
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 8, 1928No. 3824PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
After trial on the merits, libel was dismissed. 27 F. (2d) 920. In the cost bill respondent claims $468.60 for carbon copy of the evidence, $161.60 for abstract of evidence for use on argument, $17.75 for typing respondent’s brief, and $35 for 14 depositions, being $2.50 for each 8 depositions for claimant and 6 depositions for libelant. Objection was duly made. All of the items were disallowed by the clerk. Review is sought.
Only costs fixed by statute or court rule, or custom equivalent to rule, or order of eourt in a specific ease, are taxable (Parkerson v. Borst [C.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Branfoot v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1892
- Spaulding v. TuckerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1871
- Parkerson v. BorstCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
- Leary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Theron C. Lynd, Circuit Clerk and Registrar of Voters of Forrest County, State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964