Legal Opinion · Dissent

Robert S. Ohanian, Cross-Appellant v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc., Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 25, 1985No. 1385, 1466, Dockets 85-7284, 85-7330Published

1DissentWyatt, District Judge

Believing that the oral lifetime employment contract as claimed by plaintiff is void under the New York Statute of Frauds, I am compelled to dissent. The majority decision appears not only to be in error, but also to be particularly unfair to defendant in light of the way the case was tried, the instructions of the trial judge to the jury, and the form of the special questions submitted to the jury.

Although there is no disagreement with much of the ably expressed majority opinion, the issue between us needs to be carefully explained.

I

The “oral employment contract,” as claimed by Ohanian in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Rudman v. Cowles Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. D & N Boening, Inc. v. Kirsch Beverages, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. North Shore Bottling Co. v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Hadden v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API