Legal Opinion

United States v. McGovern

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided April 10, 1981No. NCM 80 2645PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

Appellant assigns three errors before this Court, one of which warrants discussion; the others we deem to be without merit. Assigned error I asserts:

THE MILITARY JUDGE MATERIALLY ERRED TO THE SUBSTANTIAL PREJUDICE OF THE APPELLANT BY PROCEEDING THROUGH TRIAL IN THE ABSENCE OF AN AFFIRMATIVE SHOWING THAT THE APPELLANT CONSENTED TO A SUBSTITUTION BY THE CONVENING AUTHORITY OF HIS DETAILED DEFENSE COUNSEL.

The original convening order detailed Lieutenant Commander Mitchell as defense counsel. It was dated 11 March 1980. A 21 March 1980 amendment relieved LCDR Mitchell and substituted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. SnowU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
  2. United States v. HarrisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API