United States v. McGovern
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge:
Appellant assigns three errors before this Court, one of which warrants discussion; the others we deem to be without merit. Assigned error I asserts:
THE MILITARY JUDGE MATERIALLY ERRED TO THE SUBSTANTIAL PREJUDICE OF THE APPELLANT BY PROCEEDING THROUGH TRIAL IN THE ABSENCE OF AN AFFIRMATIVE SHOWING THAT THE APPELLANT CONSENTED TO A SUBSTITUTION BY THE CONVENING AUTHORITY OF HIS DETAILED DEFENSE COUNSEL.
The original convening order detailed Lieutenant Commander Mitchell as defense counsel. It was dated 11 March 1980. A 21 March 1980 amendment relieved LCDR Mitchell and substituted…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. SnowU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. HarrisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. HarrisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981