Legal Opinion

Rathke v. Griffith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1950No. 31148Published

1Opinion of the Court

36 Wn.2d 394 (1950)

218 P.2d 757

CLARK E. RATHKE, Respondent,

v.

G.I. GRIFFITH et al., Appellants, H.H. HUBER et al., Defendants.[1]

No. 31148.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

May 13, 1950.

O'Leary, Meyer & O'Leary, for appellants.

Mifflin & Mifflin, for respondent.

ROBINSON, J.

This case involves two actions, consolidated for purposes of trial, in which respondent sought and obtained judgment against appellants Griffith, on account of advances made by respondent to the partnership known as Midfield Packers, a frozen foods concern, in which Mr. Griffith was allegedly a general partner.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. PoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Durant v. . AbendrothNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Giles v. VetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Rathke v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. White v. . EisemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API