Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Associated Materials, LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 7, 2013No. C12-0202RSLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment” on plaintiffs claim of age discrimination under the Washington Law Against Discrimination (‘WLAD”), RCW 49.60 et seq. ■ Summary judgment is appropriate when, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact that would preclude the entry of judgment as a matter of law. L.A. Printex Indus., Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc., 676 F.3d 841, 846 (9th Cir.2012). The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Raymond M. Cornwell v. Electra Central Credit Union James E. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API