Legal Opinion

Palm v. City of Mount Vernon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 22, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

Jaycox, J.:

This action was brought to recover for personal injuries (negligence). The defendant interposed an answer setting up a separate defense. The plaintiff moved to strike out this defense. The ground of the mo+ion apparently was that the defense was insufficient upon the face thereof. The complaint alleged compliance with section 265 of the Charter of the City of Mount Vernon (Laws of 1922, chap. 490). This section requires that a verified claim in writing shall be presented to the common council of the city of Mount Vernon and served upon the mayor or city clerk within three months…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curry v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Casey v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Pulitzer v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Van Den Bergh v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API