Legal Opinion

Kline v. Gundrum

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1849PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Common Pleas of Union. This was an action on the case by Ritter & Kline against Gundrum, the facts material to an understanding of which, are briefly these:— On the 24th January, 1842, Gundrum entered into certain articles of agreement with Ritter & Kline, by which “the said Gundrum agrees to sell a certain store or stock of goods, consisting of various kinds of goods, with plaster, coal, iron, &c., including all on the premises situate on the north side of the…

Read the full summary

Error to the Common Pleas of Union. This was an action on the case by Ritter & Kline against Gundrum, the facts material to an understanding of which, are briefly these:— On the 24th January, 1842, Gundrum entered into certain articles of agreement with Ritter & Kline, by which “the said Gundrum agrees to sell a certain store or stock of goods, consisting of various kinds of goods, with plaster, coal, iron, &c., including all on the premises situate on the north side of the Pennsylvania Canal, on the Isle of Que, in Union county, unto the said George Kline and Lewis Ritter. The said stock of…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of this court was delivered by

Coulter, J.

Twenty-three bills of exceptions are accumulated in this cause. But, generally speaking, they cover items of no great magnitude; and, with the exception of the third, do not embrace questions of much difficulty. They are but the outskirmishing of posts and detachments preparatory to the main battle. The third relates to the construction of the agreement of 19th January, 1843, and involves the principal point in the cause. Its consideration will therefore be deferred until the error assigned to the charge of the court in relation to the same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Churchman v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Titus v. Poland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Pittsburgh v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Navarre Et Ux. v. HoneaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API