Legal Opinion

Guarriello v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 16, 1973No. 738-71PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge

This is a civilian pay case in which plaintiff claims entitlement ¡to environmental differential pay for hazardous duty, over and above a 12% annual premium already being received. Jurisdiction is conferred upon this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1970). Whether plaintiff is entitled to the additional differential pay is the issue.

We hold he is not so entitled.

The facts in this case are quite simple. Plaintiff, a Wage Grade-12 (WG-12) National Guard Technician employed at a NIKE missile site, already receives 12% premium pay per year. On December 7, 1970, he performed work while exposed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Merrill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  3. Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. S.W. Aircraft Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  2. American Science & Engineering, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Marshall v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
  4. Coster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API