Geitner v. United State Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The insurance policy sued on insures Charles Harms and Paul F. Rehberg as a copartnership. The complaint in the action in which judgment was recovered by plaintiff against Harms and Rehberg, does not allege a cause of action against the defendants as partners. It alleges that the automobile was being operated by the defendant Harms for and on behalf of the defendant Rehberg. This allegation does not import a partnership use of the automobile by the defendant Harms at the time of the accident. The policy protects Harms and Rehberg from loss by reason of automobile accidents for which their…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hartigan v. . Casualty Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Davis v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Mandan Security Bank v. HeinsohnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Cunard Line Ltd. v. AbneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- McKinney v. Truck Insurance ExchangeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BoothTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.