Lamont Perkins v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case
SHARPNACK, Senior Judge.
[1] Lamont Perkins appeals from his conviction after a bench trial of possession of paraphernalia as a Level 6 felony. 1 We affirm.
Issue
[2] The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether there is sufficient evidence to convict Perkins of the offense, which we set forth in pertinent part, as enacted in the statute:
A person who possesses a raw material, an instrument, a device, or other object that the person intends to use for ... introducing into the person’s body a controlled substance ... commits ... [possession of] paraphernalia.
Facts and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Drane v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Tin Thang v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Bradley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Trigg v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Cooper v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jerold W. Leatherman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Erin C. Unger v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Melvin D. Levy v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Mitchell R. Fontaine v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017