Legal Opinion
Grady v. Garland
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 23, 1937No. 6555PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
Appellant, plaintiff below, filed a bill of complaint in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia (now the United States District Court for this District), seeking the removal of a cloud upon his title to lot 99 in square 3105 in the District of Columbia, the cloud being in the form of a restrictive covenant.
It appears that, during the years from 1901 to 1905, the real estate firm of Mid-daugh & Shannon erected a group of eight houses in square 3105, which square is bounded on the north by S street N. W. and on the west by First street N. W. Six of these…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Corrigan v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Cuneo v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Corrigan v. BuckleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924
- Castleman v. AvignoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- Kenealy v. Chevy Chase Land Co. of Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hurd v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fairchild v. RainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hundley v. GorewitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Mays v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Hurd v. HodgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.