Legal Opinion

People v. Pierre

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Abraham G. Gerges, J.

Defendant requested that this court not instruct the jury that the People must provide evidence corroborating defendant’s statement. It was urged that a corroboration instruction would focus the jury’s attention on defendant’s statement rather than on the real issues in the case.

*916CPL 60.50 states: "A person may not be convicted of any offense solely upon evidence of a confession or admission made by him without additional proof that the offense charged has been committed.”

If the People fail to prove corroboration the evidence is legally insufficient…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. SerranoNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. People v. ConaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API