State v. Flynt
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The law is well settled that the government is subject to constitutional restraints in its choice of those whom it may prosecute. As long ago as Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), 118 U.S. 356, 373-74, the United States Supreme Court stated that although a “law itself be fair on its face and impartial in appearance, yet, if it is applied and administered by public authority with an evil eye and an unequal hand, so as practically to make unjust and illegal discriminations between persons in similar circumstances, material to their rights,” there is a denial of equal protection of the laws.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Bernard M. PeskinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. GetsyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BallewOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LawsonOhio Supreme Court · 1992
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.