Legal Opinion

Tuohy v. Halsell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 26, 1912No. 1266PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John J. Carney, Judge. Action by C. J. Tuohy against Oscar D. Halsell. Judgment i'or defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, C. J.

This is an action for an alleged libel. The record discloses: That, prior to the time of making the alleged libelous affidavit by the defendant, the President of the United States had appointed and sent to the Senate for confirmation or rejection the name of John Embry to be United States attorney for the then territory of Oklahoma. That at the time said affidavit was made there were pending charges preferred by plaintiff against the qualification and fitness of said Embry for said office, and affidavits of plaintiff in support thereof had been submitted to the Department of Justice for use…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Byam v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Myers v. HodgesSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  4. Sanford v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  5. Lawson v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1862

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Janie McGhee v. Daniel D. Draper, Superintendent, Daniel D. Draper, Leroy Chamberlain, Dale Brown, Edward Billups, J. W. Puckett, and Floyd E. MottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  2. Bland v. Lawyer-Cuff Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Crittendon v. Combined Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Kleier Advertising, Inc. v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Pacific Employers Insurance v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API