Crittendon v. Combined Communications Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
This appeal presents two primary questions: (1) Did the trial court err in submitting the issue of statutory privilege to the jury? (2) Were the broadcasts concerning the default hearing and judgment substantially accurate so as to be considered a fair and true report of a judicial proceeding and, therefore, privileged under 12 O.S. 1981 § 1443.1? We answer both questions in the affirmative. Based on our examination of this case, we find the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the case remanded in conformity herewith.
*1027The pertinent and undisputed facts are that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World Christianity v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Williams v. WCAU-TVDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Otis Elevator Company v. MelottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Cobb v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Tuohy v. HalsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Wright v. Grove Sun Newspaper Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Kleier Advertising, Inc. v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Oney v. AllenOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Price v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.