Babnick v. Babnick
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.
Appellant husband was plaintiff in an action for divorce to which appellee wife filed a counterclaim. The trial judge granted the divorce without decreeing to which of the parties the divorce was granted and without specifying in whose favor the issues as to the grounds for divorce were decided. Brown v. Brown, 38 Ariz. 459, 300 P. 1007.
Examined in the light that this court must view the evidence and all reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence most favorably to upholding the decree, Spector v. Spector, 94 Ariz. 175, 382 P.2d 659 (June 1963) the evidence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rundle v. WintersArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Spector v. SpectorArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Brown v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Luithle v. LuithleWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Plageman v. PlagemanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Britven v. BritvenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Bowen v. Chemi-Cote Perlite CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.