Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1995No. 66762PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRAHAN, Judge.

This is an action arising under the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, as a result of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Missouri’s (“BCBSMO”) denial of medical benefits to Janet L. Schmitt (“Plaintiff’). The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of BCBSMO. We affirm.

Plaintiff is a participant in an employee health insurance plan (“Plan”) issued through her employer, American Model Builders. BCBSMO acts as the Plan administrator. Plaintiffs participation in the Plan became effective on March 1, 1990.

The Plan excludes…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Drexel Finley and Grace Finley v. Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. Howard E. Cox v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, Mid-America Dairymen, Inc. Retirement Plan Northern Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Estate of DamonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API