Legal Opinion

Santoro v. City of Philadelphia

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1981No. Appeal, 2604 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The 211 appellants, whose appeals are here consolidated under one caption, are nonresidents of Philadelphia who have worked in the City but have failed to pay their City wage tax. They seek review of summary judgments for unpaid taxes, interest and penalties entered in favor of the City in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County in assumpsit actions brought by the City. The affidavits of City fiscal personnel filed with the motions for summary judgments established that the appellants paid no taxes, were assessed, received notices of the assessments and took no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phaff v. GernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Amabile v. Auto Kleen Car WashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. City of Philadelphia v. KennyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Philadelphia v. Sam Bobman Department Store Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Marchese v. MarcheseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RoosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Krug v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. SmithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. White v. Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Zion & KleinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API