Legal Opinion

City of Paris v. Hale

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 22, 1896No. 1542PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEY, Associate Justice.—

Opinion. — Appellee instituted this suit against the City of Paris, and Milt Saufly, its stock policeman, and recovered judgment for a horse. The case is in this court on findings of fact by the trial court, showing:.1. That the City of Paris is a municipal corporation, incorporated by special law passed by the 21st Legislature of the State of Texas, approved March 27, 1889.

2. By its charter express authority is granted the city council to establish pounds and to regulate, restrain and prohibit the running at large of horses, mules, etc., and to authorize the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McMillen v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Gosselink v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  3. Wilcox v. HemmingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Campau v. LangleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Rose v. . HardieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Shook v. SextonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Lemery v. LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Evans v. HolmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. McVey v. BarkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API