Assemany v. Archdiocese of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDoctoroff, P.J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition and denying plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary disposition. MCR 2.116(0(10). The trial court held that plaintiff’s claims under the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq.; MSA 3.548(101) et seq., were barred by application of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. We affirm.
Defendant Gesu is a Roman Catholic church lying within the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the Archdiocese of Detroit. Plaintiff is a sixty-one-year-old white male. In 1945, he graduated from Palestrina Institute of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Weishuhn v. Catholic Diocese of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Archdiocese of Washington v. MoersenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Sabatino v. Saint Aloysius ParishNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Smith v. Calvary Christian ChurchMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Egan v. Hamline United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.