Legal Opinion
Bemis v. Hogue
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 22, 1986No. 83-CV-8122-FLPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEWBLATT, District Judge.
Before the Court are the parties’ cross Motions for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., on the issue of liability. This case is an action against defendants Franklin Electric and John Hogue for benefits and penalties in relationship to the distribution of the Franklin Electric Profit Sharing Plan (hereinafter referred to as the Plan).
Plaintiff, Marvin Bemis, a participant in the Plan, was terminated from Franklin on March 26, 1982. On April 19, 1982, Bemis sent a request by certified mail for the “non-forfeitable vested…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Morse v. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Ralph Pompano v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc. And Revised Pension Plan of Michael Schiavone& Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Porcellini v. Strassheim Printing Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Lucas v. Warner & Swasey Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Curry v. Contract Fabricators Inc. Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Sage v. Automation, Inc. Pension Plan & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Sage v. Automation, Incorporated Pension Plan And TrustCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Paris v. F. Korbel & Bros., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
- Lee v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.