Legal Opinion
Gupta v. Terra Nitrogen Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 7, 1998No. 5:97-cv-03353PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
On January 22, 1998, Defendant Terra Nitrogen Corporation filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Roger and Kanta Gupta’s complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b) and Rule 12(b)(6) [Doc. 6]. 1 In their complaint, pro se Plaintiffs Gupta sue Defendants Terra Nitrogen for securities fraud presumably under Rule 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78j, Rule 10b-5, and the 14th Amendment. Defendant Terra Nitrogen seeks to dismiss Plaintiffs Gupta’s claims arguing the complaint fails to plead claims for securities fraud with particularity as required…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Heinrich v. Waiting Angels Adoption Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Frank v. Dana Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Indiana State District Council of Laborers v. Omnicare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Mekani v. Homecomings Financial, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- New London Tobacco Market v. Ky. Fuel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.