Legal Opinion

Sosa v. Royal Bank

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 17, 1943No. 3848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In the court below defendant moved to dismiss the fourth amended complaint on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action upon which relief , could be granted. On March 9, 1942, the court filed an order entitled “Order Sustaining Motion to Dismiss." This order recited that argument on the motion to dismiss had been held, then in several paragraphs discussed the facts and the law as bearing on the motion, and finally concluded with the following paragraph:

“Now, Therefore, it is hereby Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that defendant’s motion to dismiss be, and it is hereby sustained, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wright v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  2. City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  3. Fowler v. HamillSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Hill v. HawesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. Prescott & A. C. Ry. Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ekberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  2. Toomey v. ToomeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Norte & Co. v. Defiance Industries, Inc., and R. L. Huffines, Jr., Victor Muscat, L F. Serrick, Alfred O'Gara and Edward KrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Ekberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  5. Hoiness v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API