Legal Opinion

State v. Plunkett

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2018No. 74169PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, STIGLICH, J.:

*937At issue in this appeal is whether a person who is not a prisoner can be held vicariously liable under NRS 212.165(4), which prohibits prisoners in jail from possessing a cellphone or other portable telecommunications device. We hold that the plain language of Nevada's aiding and abetting statute provides for broad applicability across the criminal code, including imposing criminal liability upon nonprisoners who assist prisoners in possessing cellphones in jail under NRS 212.165(4). Therefore, we reverse the district court's order granting respondent Alexis…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cortinas v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. United States v. Odilon GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Robert E. v. JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TP.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mendoza-Lobos v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. AMAYA VS. GUERRERO RIVERA (CHILD CUSTODY)Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Amaya v. Guerrero RiveraNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  3. United States v. EspinozaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API