Legal Opinion

People v. Credel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 16, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]). The chain of circumstances surrounding defendant’s receipt of a fraudulent debit card from the codefendant, as observed by a police officer, and defendant’s use of the card supported the inference that defendant knew it was forged (see e.g. People v Price, 16 AD3d 323 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 767 [2005]). Furthermore, defendant’s trial testimony explaining his acquisition of the card was incredible, and this testimony contained…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. People v. RayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. RICE, MARIA A., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API