Legal Opinion · Dissent

ACA Financial Guaranty Corp. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 2013Published

1Dissent

Manzanet-Daniels and Clark and, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Clark, J., as follows: Flaintiff has adequately alleged justifiable reliance, inasmuch as the documentary evidence established that plaintiff performed an exercise of reasonable due diligence. I would therefore affirm the order of the motion court denying defendant’s motion to dismiss.

ACA Financial Guaranty Corp., plaintiff herein, issued a financial guaranty policy that “wrapped” ABACUS 2007-ACI, a financial product known as a synthetic collateralized debt *498obligation (CDO).1 A financial guarantor insurer such as plaintiff issues…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v. América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V.New York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. DDJ Management, LLC v. Rhone Group LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. HSH Nordbank AG v. UBS AGAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Dembeck v. 220 Central Park South, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Goldman Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API