Legal Opinion

Western Indemnity Co. v. Southern Surety Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1920No. 136-3041PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

KITTRELL, J.

The purpose of the action out of which this appeal arose was in effect to obtain the construction of a contract.

On the 18th day of May, 1912, in the city of St. Louis, Arthur G. Moseley, as attorney for the Southern Surety Company, addressed a proposition in writing to Thos. B. Love, as attorney of the Federál Union Surety Company, which proposition was by said Love, on behalf of his client, accepted in the terms in which it was made. The contract was to begin on June 15, 1912, and expire on June 16, 1913, and when it expired, and it was sought to adjust the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morrow v. MorganTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Williams v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. National Cash Register Co. v. Hagan & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bifano v. Econo Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Dallas Nat. Bank v. Peaslee-Gaulbert Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Birk v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Jackson v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Bifano v. Econo Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API